AppFan.com: The Official Website of Appalachian State Fans
Home  |  Blog  |  Gameday  |  Photo Gallery  |  Video Gallery  |  Fan Store  |  Contact Us

The mystery of just how much the Big Growth now costs
Wednesday June 24th 2009, 11:37 am
Filed under: App Football, The Rock

Very nice …App State has released a press release on recent actions by the board of trustees. And the update on the athletics campaign has us confused.

Are we now looking at a $68 million athletics expansion?

Up to $15 million in additional funds are needed to complete athletics facilities enhancement projects because of change orders to the original construction plans as well as cost overruns, Lovins said. A combination of athletics fees, private donations and revenues from ticket sales will be used to repay the bonds. The project, which includes renovation and expansion of Kidd Brewer Stadium, is on schedule for completion in late August.

It also notes that another $20M in bonds will be issued primarily for the stadium project. If memory (and Google) serves us correctly, that means roughly $68M in bonds will finance the athletics campaign. That’s twice(!) the original announcement.

Or are we missing something?

App State has been pretty mum and hush-hush on exactly what is going on financially with the Big Growth (note the absence of any cost numbers).

Here’s a brief timeline of what’s been reported regarding it. Help us help you make sense of it all.

NOVEMBER 2005
App State officially announces a $32 million athletic facilities enhancement plan. It will “create a new Kidd Brewer Stadium Complex, a new baseball stadium with a new indoor athletics facility, a new softball stadium, a new soccer stadium, a new tennis complex, a new field hockey stadium, a new indoor hardwood court and, eventually, a new Kidd Brewer Stadium expansion.”

With regard to paying for it, it’ll primarily be students.

$20.8 million has already been raised of the $32 million needed.

“The bulk of this has come from the student fees that began a few years ago, and we’ve had $5 million donated from private funds so far,” said Cobb.

Student fees were put in place so that athletic facilities at ASU could be improved. Cobb said that the remaining $11.2 million will come from private donors.

According to the campus paper, “Some $15-$16 million has come from the increase of student fees over the past two years … The rest has come from private donations.”

RECAP – A $32 million price tag. Students put in $16M; donors $5M. Need to raise – $11M.

SOMETIME SPRING 2007
More than a year after the original announcement, the Appalachian Today magazine has a brief update on the campaign. It reports “$24.5 million has been raised toward the $32 million goal.”

RECAP -That suggests about $4M more has been raised by private donors, making it $16M students and $9M donors. Need to raise – $7M.

DECEMBER 2007
App State announces that its trustees are seeking state approval for $32 million in bonds that would finance the expanded athletic facilities at Kidd Brewer Stadium. Yet at the same time, the project’s total cost is now reported to be $53M.

And student fees for athletics were raised uh-gin, in part for the stadium.

Lovins explained that $18 of the $40 athletics fee increase would be used to support a portion of the east side improvements to Kidd Brewer Stadium. Half of the new seating will be reserved for students. That portion of the athletics enhancements project will cost an estimated $8.5 million. The remainder of the athletics fee increase will be used to support increased scholarship costs and salaries for employees in the athletics department.

It is also noted that $16M in bonds have already approved for the project.

RECAP – Total estimated student contributions now at $24.5M*. Total athletics expansion at $53M. Total bonds sought/approved is $48M.

SEPTEMBER 2008
A campus press release on year-end fundraising states that $2 million has been given to the athletics campaign. “To date, more than $10 million in private support” has been received.

RECAP – Suggests another $1M has been raised from donors. So $10M donors plus $24.5M students* equals $34M raised. Still needed – $19M.

DECEMBER 2008
Athletics reports to trustees it is “approaching” $11M in private giving for project.

JUNE 2009
Trustees reportedly want to “issue up to $31.068 million in special obligation bonds to finance improvements to Cone Residence Hall and completion of the athletics facilities construction project. Lovins expects that the residence hall project will cost no more than $10 million to complete.”

So that means another $20M in bonds for athletics project.

RECAP – Bonds sought/approved for athletics projects now at $68M (Original $16M with additional $32M from Dec 07 and another $20M sought this month)

* This assumes student fee contributions were capped at $16M, per the original announcement.

** Should have added, photo stolen from ASUjoan’s flickr page




Great reporting there Woodward. Surely this is a conspiracy reaching into the highest levels of the ASU administration. If the actual cost of the facilities were to be determined, all that we know and love will come crumbling down..

Oh wait..

In any event, I’ll have my flowerpot on the balcony.

Comment by RA 06.24.09 @ 12:32 pm

This is one of those issues where it makes me wonder how much information the trustees should be (or are) required to share with the public.

As far as I’m aware, taxes have not been used to finance the stadium. So, in that sense, I assume ASU would not be required to disclose all of the project’s financial details to the public since it’s privately financed. (Someone correct me if I’m wrong about these details. I’m not a Freedom of Information Act expert.)

At the same time, I don’t understand why the trustees won’t clarify what the actual costs are, and what happened.

Here’s an example: As of August 2008 at Anderson University in Indiana, a private school, $80 million worth of construction projects were funded and set to break ground by August 2009; however, many of those projects have been delayed. They’re no longer fully funded. Why? Because many of the donations weren’t given as checks. They were stocks, which have since tanked. The $80 million from last year is now worth only $60M. Basically, Anderson either has to wait for the stocks to regain their value, or they have to raise $20 million more.

Could the loss in value of donated stocks be a reason why the price tag has shot up at ASU? Who knows? But in the case of Anderson, the administration’s honesty makes it easy to sympathize with the projects’ delays & shortfalls. ASU needs to be honest about what has happened, whether it’s legally obligated or not.

Comment by Michael 06.24.09 @ 12:43 pm

Random question for Appnaysayer in response to a previous post:

What’s so bad about the Old Belk Library building? I never took classes there because it was still the library when I graduated. I thought it was renovated and figured it was a good, spacious place, far better than Whitener. Besides, I always figured the worst remaining building on campus, besides some of the dorms, was IG Greer.

Comment by Michael 06.24.09 @ 12:48 pm

nice picture of KBS

Comment by ASUjoan 06.24.09 @ 1:55 pm

well I know other schools in the state might be bigger but I’d like to see a comparison to Wake Forest, UNC, NC State, and ECU on what they’re spending on athletics facilities

Comment by John 06.24.09 @ 2:12 pm

I wonder how long that $10 Enhancement Fee for season tickets will be in place.

Comment by Jon 06.24.09 @ 2:24 pm

I don’t even feel like talking about it.

How about that?

Comment by clayton 06.24.09 @ 3:31 pm

Its hard to imagine fallen stocks could account for that much of a monetary difference. Most of the quoted money came from student fees, for that kind of a change, virtually all of the private donations would have to be stocks that totally tanked (like as in 80%+ of their original value).

Comment by browsing-appfan 06.24.09 @ 6:58 pm

the OBL rocked as a classroom facility. as a history grad, I far preferred its confines to that of whitener. WAAAY more room and far better smelling.

Comment by ah59396 06.24.09 @ 7:44 pm

Interesting bit of research AppFan.

First question: What is typical for change orders/cost overruns on a project of $32 million?

15 million seems a little high unless there were some major changes that needed to be made as the project progressed…?

Comment by appfantoo 06.24.09 @ 9:09 pm

Fascinating stuff on finances. 68 million seems to me a huge amount for ASU to spend on such a “renovation” project. But, as several here have pointed out, what do I know?

As for Old Belk (I think it’s now called Anne Belk Hall), any student who actually went to class there will tell you the university left the building half complete. Indeed one whole floor was unfinished. There is NO soundproofing at all; the walls between classrooms only go as high as the false ceiling so sound bleeds in from all directions. I’m told that when a lecturer pauses, students can hear others talking on cell phones in the hall. Films literally rattle pictures on walls. Some of the furniture is still ancient, hand-carried from Whitener, complete with graffiti; ceiling tiles (still there from the library days) are crumbling; the heating/cooling (although renovated) is random at best. Sanford? Have you been in the place lately? Puh-leeze…

Comment by Appnaysayer 06.24.09 @ 9:30 pm

The Old Belk Library is a joke.

And not a good one, like I tell.

Comment by clayton 06.25.09 @ 5:38 am

Had the good fortune to speak with someone from Shelco last week. He indicated the new building will wind up costing around $30 mil. Over $10 mil for the additional seating on the East Stands, bathrooms (all of them), concession stands, and I am assuming new lights. When you add these figures to those of the Varsity Gym makeover, baseball stadium, soccer stadium, indoor practice facility, turning the old baseball field into a softball facility, ect. I can see where $68 mil is possible

Comment by AppAttack 06.25.09 @ 7:42 am

Do as we did and step up to the plate. Increase your giving and if not a yosef member then join….be proud of what we have accomplished. Look at all of the changes to ASU in the past 5 years or so and it is amazing what our campus has become. We are close to closing the gap on the extra money thanks to hard working administrators through private giving…Our galss is not half empty!

Comment by Applover 06.25.09 @ 10:23 am

Change orders seem to be the main reason for the over run. These would be comprised of upgrades, plan changes due to conditions encountered that differ from the original plans, material cost increases (concrete), etc. Bad thing about this is the timing of the start of construction in relation to the construction industry today. Projects are routinely bidding for 25-40% less than they were just a year ago due to lack of work on the market leading to the most competitive environment in construction history. However, the funds would probably not been there today either. Chicken / egg thing I suppose.

Comment by Whiskeyriver 06.25.09 @ 10:47 am

A Willie Nelson fan?

Comment by DRM 06.25.09 @ 11:38 am

I can imagine that the unknowns surrounding grading, soil quality…etc around the stadium produced some serious changes to initial plans. Homes built on level ground encounter these problems so imagine the additional issues when you are literally moving a mountain to build a tower.

As for the crappy Belk, Sanford Hall conditions…we just call those “character.” Or at least that is what we called it when Walker Hall used to flood or have electrical problems or the heat would go out or the sidewalk would erode……you get the picture.

Comment by Jamey 06.25.09 @ 12:02 pm

I haven’t done research into App’s specific situation but the added cost could be due to the turmoil in the financial markets. In addition to falling value of stock contributions, if App had not went to the bond market at the best time, they would have had to pay much higher interest rates. This is especially true if they went to the market back in the fall. I think the rates have come down since then but are still higher than what they were several years ago.

Comment by Jeb 06.25.09 @ 12:16 pm

If I recall, the initial $32 million didn’t include the new East side deck or the new bathrooms/concessions underneath that structure. That’s not the entire overrun, but it’s likely a large part of it. Also, we experienced a huge run up in the cost of materials during the bulk of the building phase, as well as fuel costs to the construction companies shuttling workers up and down the mountain. That’s got to be another part of the overrun, which was likely written into the contract but not really part of the “stated” costs initially. Working in the building industry, I can see how this happened. I doubt we’ll ever see the numbers released with any fanfare, though.

Comment by BeauFoster 06.25.09 @ 1:56 pm

The contractor also said ASU had a “pile” of money already invested in the players walkway from the building to the field. Lots & lots of rock to break through.

Comment by AppAttack 06.25.09 @ 9:33 pm

This is the best way for the university to invest in the future. This will do ten-fold more than any other building on campus. We need to encourage our athletic dept. to do exactly what they are doing.
We never question Washington or The BIG O.
Cut them some slack. Unlike them they are actually getting something done!!!

Comment by richard 06.30.09 @ 10:36 am

This is the best way for the university to invest in the future. This will do ten-fold more than any other building on campus. We need to encourage our athletic dept. to do exactly what they are doing.
We never question Washington or The BIG O.
Cut them some slack. Unlike them they are actually getting something done!!!

Comment by Max 06.30.09 @ 10:39 am

Oscar Robertson is in DC? With richard (Cheney? Nixon?) and Max (Cleland?)?

Comment by DRM 07.01.09 @ 4:31 pm

Just hanging with Les Maddox

Comment by richard & max 07.02.09 @ 3:23 pm

The axe(handle) man? He’s older than I am. Hell, he’s even dead! But then, so is Nixon.

At least you (you guys?) are down to one post per post.

Comment by DRM 07.02.09 @ 3:53 pm





Fan Store » All Categories
Fan Store » Featured Items

AppFan.comon Facebook

Copyright © 2010 APPFAN.COM — All Rights Reserved.
xx